After an initial teacher education inspection
There is formal feedback to the provider at the end of the main inspection week. Final judgements are made at the on-site moderation meeting. For each of the two main judgements, inspectors will need to:
- consider all of the evidence under each of the contributing key inspection questions to determine the sub-grades
- check there are no contradictions where evidence may contribute to more than one graded judgement
- use the grade criteria to determine the main grades.
After an inspection and before leaving the provider, the lead inspector will make sure the provider knows:
- about the grades awarded for each judgement
- that the grades are provisional and, although unlikely, may be subject to change through moderation
- that the main points provided in the feedback will be referred to in the report
- about the recommendations for improvement
- the procedures leading to the publication of the report
- the complaints procedure
- where relevant, about the implications of the provider being graded inadequate.
Following a moderation process by us, the report will be sent to the provider to check factual accuracy prior to publication.
The report evaluates how well a provider is doing, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses. It will have information about:
- the effectiveness of the training
- what a provider does well
- recommendations on how they might improve
- overall judgements on how good a provider is in particular aspects
- grade 1 (outstanding)
- grade 2 (good)
- grade 3 (satisfactory)
- grade 4 (inadequate).